Are We Driving Strategic Results or Metric Mania? Evaluating Performance in the Public Sector

Authors

  • William Casey
  • Wendi Peck
  • Natalie J. Webb
  • Phil Quast

Abstract

A strategy is irrelevant if you cannot implement it. That is the collective realization of public and private leaders after decades of obsession with strategy and strategic thinking. That realization has led to a voracious market for ideas on execution, alignment around strategy and predictable achievement of strategic results. Many performance management systems or tools, all meant to help organizational leaders implement their strategic goals and objectives, fail to provide results. We suggest a framework in which strategic and operational goals can be translated into a handful of meaningful metrics that we define as whole goals. Whole goals can then used to drive decision-making and to hold leadership accountable for achieving measurable results. We believe the ability of a public organization to measure and evaluate its performance is of critical importance if today’s leaders and managers are expected to promote successful execution of organizational strategic goals and objectives.

Author Biographies

William Casey

William Casey, Ph.D. is President, Executive Leadership Group, Inc., Denver, CO, USA.

Wendi Peck

Wendi Peck, is CEO, Executive Leadership Group, Inc., Denver, CO, USA.

Natalie J. Webb

Natalie J. Webb is Associate Professor in the Defense Resources Management Institute, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey CA, USA.

Phil Quast

Phil Quast, VADM (USN, ret), is the Executive Learning Officer for the U.S. Navy, Monterey, CA, USA.

Downloads

How to Cite

Casey, W., Peck, W., Webb, N. J., & Quast, P. (2014). Are We Driving Strategic Results or Metric Mania? Evaluating Performance in the Public Sector. International Public Management Review, 9(2), 90–106. Retrieved from https://ipmr.net/index.php/ipmr/article/view/57

Issue

Section

Articles