Measuring Trust in Government: A Hong Kong Perspective

Authors

  • Margaret Burnett
  • Stephen Tsang
  • Sonja Studer
  • Peter Hills
  • Richard Welford

Abstract

Trust and legitimacy occupy a central position in contemporary discourse surrounding the process of environmental reform in late-modern societies. This study examines dimensions of trust from stakeholders and uses a group process to enrich the data describing and explaining the reasons behind a possible ‘trust deficit’ in the context of environmental governance and policy making in Hong Kong. Results from focus groups indicate that trust in government with regard to environmental issues is generally very low. Factors include poor leadership, a rather out-dated mindset of the government, inflexible government structures, inconsistent governance, misplaced knowledge and expertise in the government and its reluctance to create dialogue or communication. Stakeholders suggested that to enhance public trust in the government, the government needed to develop stronger leadership, reform government structure, improve communication on environmental issues to the public, take input from the community more seriously and make better use of regulation and provide incentives for environmental protection.

Author Biographies

Margaret Burnett

Margaret Burnett is former Senior Project Officer, Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, Hong Kong, PRC.

Stephen Tsang

Stephen Tsang is Senior Project Officer, Kadoorie Institute, Hong Kong, PRC.

Sonja Studer

Sonja Studer is Manager, Energy and Environment, Association of the Swiss Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Industries, Zurich, Switzerland.

Peter Hills

Peter Hills is Director and Chair Professor, Kadoorie Institute, Hong Kong, PRC.

Richard Welford

Richard Welford is Associate Professor, Kadoorie Institute, Hong Kong, PRC.

Downloads

How to Cite

Burnett, M., Tsang, S., Studer, S., Hills, P., & Welford, R. (2014). Measuring Trust in Government: A Hong Kong Perspective. International Public Management Review, 9(2), 107–126. Retrieved from https://ipmr.net/index.php/ipmr/article/view/58

Issue

Section

Articles