The Efficiency of Developing Country Public Financial Management Systems
The objective of this paper is to demonstrate a procedure for measuring the technical efficiency of developing country public financial management (PFM) systems using available public expenditure and financial accountability (PEFA) assessments. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is used to measure the relative technical efficiency of sixtynine country based PFM systems. Technical efficiency is measured as the ratio of a PFM’s PEFA score on budget credibility to it’s maximum possible score on budget credibility derived using DEA and the existing PEFA database.
This measure of technical efficiency involves applying DEA to the available database of PEFA assessments to construct a hypothetical PFM system that has a higher score on budget credibility and at least identical or lower scores on the other core dimensions of PFM performance. Accordingly, the relative technical efficiency of PFM systems investigated in this article is based on the achievement of budget credibility as defined by the PEFA framework. This notion of technical efficiency is therefore quite unrrelated and distinct from the achievement of international good practice in PFM that underly the PEFA assessments. Indeed it is possible that PFM systems operating well below what public finance experts would regard as good or best international practice may achieve relatively high technical efficiency scores while others operating close to what is perceived as good or best international practice may be found to be less technically efficient.
In the present database of sixty-nine PFM systems, thirteen are identified as operating at 100% technical efficiency. The DEA identifies efficiency benchmarks for the remaining less technically efficient PFM systems.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License that allows others to share the work for non-commercial use with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors and IPMR are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, distribute it via EBSCO, or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.