@article{Evald_Nissen_Clarke_Munksgaard_2014, title={Reviewing cross-field Public Private Innovation literature: Current research themes and future research themes yet to be explored}, volume={15}, url={https://ipmr.net/index.php/ipmr/article/view/233}, abstractNote={<span style="font-family: ’Times New Roman’,’serif’; font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-US">The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic </span><span style="font-family: ’Times New Roman’,’serif’; font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: ’Times New Roman’; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-US">overview of current and future research themes discussed in the literature of Public Private Innovation (PPI). The overview is much needed as </span><span style="font-family: ’Times New Roman’,’serif’; font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-US">different research areas currently investigating PPI seem unaware of each other’s findings and, as such, produce knowledge that is unconnected. Bridging these unconnected knowledge resources </span><span style="font-family: ’Times New Roman’,’serif’; font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: ’Times New Roman’; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-US">makes it possible for researchers to position their PPI studies more effectively, and practitioners become aware of the many cross-research contributions existing in the area of PPI. The overview is provided through </span><span style="font-family: ’Times New Roman’,’serif’; font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-US">a systematic review and content analysis of PPI literature, bringing together PPI knowledge from different research areas. Our findings point out that current research into PPI mainly is process-oriented, focusing on the early activities taking place in PPI projects (development activities), and especially interested in how to manage relationships between public and private players. Also, current research mainly adopts a public sector perspective when investigating PPI. Further, our findings show that suggestions for future research keep this particular orientation. Only few researchers discuss PPI from the perspective of private firms, or consider those implementation and commercialization challenges that may exist after solutions have been developed.</span>}, number={2}, journal={International Public Management Review}, author={Evald, Majbritt Rostgaard and Nissen, Helle Aarøe and Clarke, Ann Højbjerg and Munksgaard, Kristin Balslev}, year={2014}, month={Dec.}, pages={32–57} }